Recovery checks ยท reviewed 16 October 2026
A normal page is one part of the recovery.
A website can look better after a change while important questions remain. A useful review records the visible result and the evidence behind it.
The symptom and the cause are different questions
A redirect or unwanted page shows something that needs investigating. Removing it does not explain how it appeared. The review should state what is known about the affected software, files or access and what could not be determined.
Access and surrounding systems matter
The website sits inside hosting and account arrangements. Where the incident involves those systems, the owner or provider may need to act. Website work should not silently expand into a wider investigation without an agreed scope.
Restoration needs a practical check
A backup file is useful only when its contents and restore behavior are understood well enough for the proposed recovery. Checking a separate restored copy can also reveal missing uploads, settings or more recent business data that need a plan.
Important tasks need repeating
Navigation, sign-in, forms and commerce behavior may have changed during the incident or recovery. Agree on safe test data and avoid charging or messaging real customers. Record what was checked and which provider-controlled behavior remains unverified.
Leave questions visible after handoff
Findings, unresolved items and follow-up responsibilities should be part of the handoff. The WordPress recovery guidance provides additional context for investigating a compromised WordPress site.
Read how Faith Forge Labs plans website recovery or describe what happened.